AG -v- Sousa [2017] JRC 053 (29 March 2017)
- Citation
- [2017] JRC 053
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Criminal / Fitness to Plead Hearing
More details
- Posture
- Criminal / Fitness to Plead Hearing
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
Based on expert evidence and the legal test from AG-v-O'Driscoll, the defendant is declared fit to plead and may stand trial.
Court disposition
Defendant declared fit to plead
Orders
- Defendant may stand trial on the counts in the Indictment
02
Material facts
Parties
Attorney General
ProsecutionSousa
Defendant03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal / Fitness to Plead Hearing
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Is the defendant fit to plead to charges of sodomy and indecent assault?
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Both Crown and defence agree, based on expert reports, that the defendant is now fit to plead.
- Respondent
- Both Crown and defence agree, based on expert reports, that the defendant is now fit to plead.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
AG-v-O'Driscoll [2003] JLR 390
Test for fitness to plead
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
Based on expert evidence and the legal test from AG-v-O'Driscoll, the defendant is declared fit to plead and may stand trial.
Court disposition
Defendant declared fit to plead
- Defendant may stand trial on the counts in the Indictment
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
JUDGMENT THE DEPUTY BAILIFF: 1. This is a hearing before the Inferior Number to determine whether or not the defendant is fit to plead to answer to two counts on the Indictment, those of sodomy and indecent assault. In its judgment in this matter of 10 th March 2016 ( AG-v-Sousa [2016] JRC 059 ) the Inferior Number declared that he was not fit to plead and as a result he was detained at Her Majesty's pleasure in a secure hospital in the United Kingdom.
2. We have before us the reports of two experts, the same experts upon who the Court based its judgment on the 10 th March, 2016, and they reflect the fact that the accused has had improvements in his mental health the effect of which is that both experts are now of the opinion that he is fit to plead, applying the test that must be applied in these circumstances specifically that set out in the case of AG-v-O'Driscoll [2003] JLR 390 . We have had the opportunity of reading in advance and considering the reports of those experts and it is right that we reflect that both the Crown and the defence are ad idem in their conclusions that this defendant is fit to plead - we so find and declare that he is fit to plead and may stand trial on the counts on the Indictment. Authorities AG-v-Sousa [2016] JRC 059 . AG-v-O'Driscoll [2003] JLR 390 . Page Last Updated: 22 May 2017 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.