Jersey Judgment

AG -v- Woolley [2018] JRC 023 (26 January 2018)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Exceptional circumstances including substantial provocation, genuine remorse, positive character, and exceptional references justify avoidance of custodial sentence for grave and criminal assault; compensation order is appropriate.

Court disposition

Non-custodial sentence imposed; community service and compensation ordered.

Orders

  • Defendant to carry out 150 hours of community service, equivalent to 9 months imprisonment.
  • Defendant to pay £400 compensation to victim at £100 per month.
  • 4 week imprisonment default sentence if compensation payments are not made.

02

Material facts

Parties

Unknown Defendant

Defendant

Crown

Prosecutor

Victim

Victim

Amounts and remedies

  • Community Service Hours: 150
  • Compensation Amount: GBP 400
  • Monthly Compensation Payment: GBP 100
  • Default Imprisonment Sentence: weeks 4

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal / Sentencing

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Mitigation includes guilty plea, genuine remorse, positive character, absence of bad character, provocation, and exceptional references.
Respondent
Violent assaults on the streets normally result in imprisonment unless exceptional circumstances are present.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Harrison-v-AG [2004] JLR 111

    Custody threshold for violent street assaults is normally passed unless exceptional circumstances exist.

  2. 02

    Criminal Justice (Compensation Orders) (Jersey) Law 1994

    Compensation orders are appropriate where custodial sentence is avoided.

  3. 03

    AG-v-Silva [2015] JRC 153

    Sentencing must consider mitigation and positive character.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Exceptional circumstances including substantial provocation, genuine remorse, positive character, and exceptional references justify avoidance of custodial sentence for grave and criminal assault; compensation order is appropriate.

Obiter and limits

  • References provided were exceptional and demonstrated courageous action.
  • Defendant's loss of chosen career is a matter of regret.

Court disposition

Non-custodial sentence imposed; community service and compensation ordered.

  • Defendant to carry out 150 hours of community service, equivalent to 9 months imprisonment.
  • Defendant to pay £400 compensation to victim at £100 per month.
  • 4 week imprisonment default sentence if compensation payments are not made.

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2018] JRC 023

JUDGMENT THE DEPUTY BAILIFF: 1. You are to be sentenced for one count of grave and criminal assault which took place on the night of the 21 st August last year. We do not need to repeat the Crown's explanation of the facts. Suffice to say that you were ultimately the attacker, you threw punches, you used your leg to kick him once with an attempt to take him to the ground and when you were both on the ground with you on top, you subjected him to what was referred to as " a flurry of blows".

2. As the Court has said, persons who commit violent assaults on the streets of St Helier normally are sent to prison unless there are exceptional circumstances. In this case your victim did not wish to complain and, fortunately, his injuries were moderate. We accept that there was a substantial element of provocation which caused you in part to lose control in this way.

3. You have no relevant previous convictions and you are a low likelihood of further violence and why you did this is frankly inexplicable to us. You do not only have the benefit of an absence of bad character but you have a positive good character. You have supported your grandparents for a protracted period in a practical way, and you have a good employment record.

4. There is other mitigation available to you. Not only of course is there your plea of guilty but the letter of remorse which we accept as genuine and which is also reflected in the letter of apology to your victim. We also have had regard to the number of references which speak very well of you indeed. It would not be going too far to describe those references themselves as exceptional. We note in particular the reference from Mr Jones which points to very good and courageous action on your behalf.

5. You have already suffered as a result of your inexplicable act and foolishness. You are now denied the career that you have chosen and worked and devoted yourself to, and that is a matter of regret going forward.

6. Although the custody threshold is undoubtedly passed for this offence we think looking at the matter as we are invited to do in the round there are exceptional circumstances which enable us to avoid a custodial sentence on this occasion. You will serve the equivalent of a 9 month sentence of imprisonment by carrying out 150 hours of community service.

7. We now turn to the question of compensation. In our view it is appropriate, particularly as we have taken the exceptional course of not sentencing you to imprisonment, to enable some element of compensation to be paid to your victim. We direct that you will pay £400 by way of compensation to your victim, to be paid at a rate of £100 per month. As we are required by the law we say that there will be a sentence in default of 4 weeks. In other words, if you fail to make any payment a 4 week imprisonment default sentence will kick in. Of course that does not happen if you maintain the payments as you have been directed. Authorities Harrison-v-AG [2004] JLR 111 . AG-v-Silva [2015] JRC 153 . Criminal Justice (Compensation Orders) (Jersey) Law 1994. UK Courts Compensation Guidelines. Page Last Updated: 19 Mar 2018 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Harrison-v-AG [2004] JLR 111

Case cited

AG-v-Silva [2015] JRC 153

Case cited

Criminal Justice (Compensation Orders) (Jersey) Law 1994

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

UK Courts Compensation Guidelines

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.