AG v Ahmed [2002] JRC 188 (10 October 2002)

AG v Ahmed [2002] JRC 188 (10 October 2002)

Substantial mitigation is warranted due to the defendant's cooperation with the prosecution and personal circumstances, justifying a reduced sentence and no deportation order.

Citation
[2002] JRC 188
Parties
Defendant: Ahmed; Prosecution: The Crown
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
10 October 2002
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
Outcome
convicted and sentenced
Legal Topics
Drug Offences, Sentencing, Mitigation, Deportation
Criminal Law Drug Offences Sentencing Mitigation Deportation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ahmed

Defendant

The Crown

Prosecution

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Appropriate sentence for possession of heroin with intent to supply
  2. 2 Extent of mitigation for cooperation with prosecution
  3. 3 Appropriateness of deportation order

Ratio Decidendi

Substantial mitigation is warranted due to the defendant's cooperation with the prosecution and personal circumstances, justifying a reduced sentence and no deportation order.

Court Disposition

convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • 2 years' imprisonment overall
  • 1 month's imprisonment on count 1 (heroin possession for personal use)