Jersey Judgment

Alker v Le Masurier Ltd. [1992] JLR 173 (21 July 1992)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The magistrate has discretion to adjourn eviction proceedings in the Petty Debts Court pending the outcome of an action in the Royal Court, but such proceedings must be determined within a reasonable time after the expiry of the period for challenging the notice to quit.

Court disposition

Application for stay of proceedings is subject to the magistrate's discretion; eviction proceedings must be determined within a reasonable time.

02

Material facts

Parties

Alker

Applicant

Le Masurier Ltd.

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil / Application for Stay of Proceedings

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant argued that the eviction proceedings in the Petty Debts Court should be stayed pending the outcome of related proceedings in the Royal Court, relying on the magistrate's discretion under art. 3(3) of the 1946 Law.
Respondent
The respondent contended that eviction proceedings should proceed without delay and be determined summarily within a reasonable time after the expiry of the period for challenging the notice to quit.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Loi (1946) concernant l'expulsion des locataires refractaires, art. 3(3)

    Art. 3(3) of the Loi (1946) concernant l'expulsion des locataires refractaires confers discretion on the magistrate to adjourn eviction proceedings if appropriate.

  2. 02

    Loi (1946) concernant l'expulsion des locataires refractaires

    Eviction proceedings must be determined within a reasonable time following expiry of the time for challenging the notice to quit.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The magistrate has discretion to adjourn eviction proceedings in the Petty Debts Court pending the outcome of an action in the Royal Court, but such proceedings must be determined within a reasonable time after the expiry of the period for challenging the notice to quit.

Court disposition

Application for stay of proceedings is subject to the magistrate's discretion; eviction proceedings must be determined within a reasonable time.

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[1992] JLR 173

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Alker v Le Masurier Ltd. [1992] JLR 173 (21 July 1992) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1992/JLR920173.html Cite as: [1992] JLR 173 [ New search ] [ Help ] Alker v Le Masurier Ltd. 1992 JLR 173 (21 July 1992) Civil Procedure - stay of proceedings - parallel proceedings in different Jersey courts - Loi (1946) concernant l'expulsion des locataires refractaires, art. 3(3) confers discretion on magistrate ("s'il y a lieu") to adjourn eviction proceedings in Petty Debts Court pending outcome of action in Royal Court-eviction proceedings to be determined within reasonable time ("sommairement") following expiry of time for challenging notice to quit The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 1992 JLR 173 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1992/JLR920173.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Loi (1946) concernant l'expulsion des locataires refractaires, art. 3(3)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.