Alker v Le Masurier Ltd. [1992] JLR 173 (21 July 1992)
The magistrate has discretion to adjourn eviction proceedings in the Petty Debts Court pending the outcome of an action in the Royal Court, but such proceedings must be determined within a reasonable time after the expiry of the period for challenging the notice to quit.
- Citation
- [1992] JLR 173
- Parties
- Applicant: Alker; Respondent: Le Masurier Ltd.
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 21 July 1992
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application for Stay of Proceedings
- Outcome
- Application for stay of proceedings is subject to the magistrate's discretion; eviction proceedings must be determined within a reasonable time.
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Proceedings, Parallel Proceedings, Eviction, Discretion of Magistrate
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alker
Applicant
Le Masurier Ltd.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Stay of Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the magistrate has discretion to adjourn eviction proceedings in the Petty Debts Court pending outcome of an action in the Royal Court under art. 3(3) of the Loi (1946) concernant l'expulsion des locataires refractaires
- 2 Whether eviction proceedings must be determined within a reasonable time after expiry of the time for challenging a notice to quit
Ratio Decidendi
The magistrate has discretion to adjourn eviction proceedings in the Petty Debts Court pending the outcome of an action in the Royal Court, but such proceedings must be determined within a reasonable time after the expiry of the period for challenging the notice to quit.
Court Disposition
Application for stay of proceedings is subject to the magistrate's discretion; eviction proceedings must be determined within a reasonable time.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment