AG -v- Andrade and Ors 21-Feb-2006 [2006] JRC 029 (21 February 2006)
Sentences must reflect both the unprecedented quantity of heroin and the specific roles and mitigation of each defendant, with higher sentences justified by Jersey's small population and high drug prices. Substantial discounts for guilty pleas are warranted but limited by timing. Swinburne's exceptional health justifies further reduction as an act of mercy.
- Citation
- [2006] JRC 029
- Parties
- Defendant: Andrade; Defendant: Andrews; Defendant: Swinburne; Accomplice: Silvester; Prosecutor: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
- Outcome
- conviction and sentencing
- Legal Topics
- Drug Importation, Sentencing, Mitigation, Conspiracy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Andrade
Defendant
Andrews
Defendant
Swinburne
Defendant
Silvester
Accomplice
Attorney General
Prosecutor
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentencing for large-scale heroin importation
- 2 Assessment of individual roles and mitigation in drug trafficking cases
Ratio Decidendi
Sentences must reflect both the unprecedented quantity of heroin and the specific roles and mitigation of each defendant, with higher sentences justified by Jersey's small population and high drug prices. Substantial discounts for guilty pleas are warranted but limited by timing. Swinburne's exceptional health justifies further reduction as an act of mercy.
Court Disposition
conviction and sentencing
Orders
- Andrade sentenced to 12 years' imprisonment
- Andrews sentenced to 15 years' imprisonment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment