In the matter of the Amy Tutelles [2011] JCA 144 (27 July 2011)

Mrs Amy had no legal entitlement to dower payments absent formal claim or agreement; summary judgment was justified based on forensic accountant's report and absence of triable defence; caveat removal was refused to protect judgment creditor's interests.

Citation: [2011] JCA 144
Parties: Appellant: Angela Amy; First Respondent: Anastasia Amy; Second Respondent: Marianna Amy
Jurisdiction: Jersey
Judgment Date: 27 July 2011
Procedural Posture: Appeal / Judgment
Outcome: Appeal dismissed; summary judgment upheld; application to lift caveat refused.
Legal Topics: Tutelle Administration, Dower Rights, Summary Judgment, Caveat Removal, Estate Management

Family Law Trusts and Estates Succession Law Tutelle Administration Dower Rights Summary Judgment Caveat Removal Estate Management

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5

Parties

Angela Amy

Appellant

Anastasia Amy

First Respondent

Marianna Amy

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Entitlement to dower payments from estate income
2 Validity of summary judgment based on forensic accounting
3 Existence of contract or agreement regarding estate disposition

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; summary judgment upheld; application to lift caveat refused.

Orders

Judgment against Mrs Amy for £70,739.25 in favour of Anastasia Amy.
Judgment against Mrs Amy for £77,305.50 in favour of Marianna Amy.