Burnett -v- Thompson (Matrimonial) [2014] JRC 205 (23 October 2014)

Burnett -v- Thompson (Matrimonial) [2014] JRC 205 (23 October 2014)

The Registrar exercised her discretion properly under Rule 61, considering all relevant factors, and there was no procedural irregularity or error in law. The appellant's subjective perception of unfairness did not meet the objective test for bias or justify referral to the Royal Court. The appeal was dismissed as...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] JRC 205
Parties
Appellant: Appellant Husband; Respondent: Respondent Wife
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
23 October 2014
Procedural Posture
Family Law Appeal / Appeal Against Registrar's Refusal to Refer Ancillary Relief Application to Royal Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Ancillary Relief, Appeal Procedure, Judicial Discretion, Referral to Royal Court
Family Law Ancillary Relief Appeal Procedure Judicial Discretion Referral to Royal Court

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Appellant Husband

Appellant

Respondent Wife

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Family Law Appeal / Appeal Against Registrar's Refusal to Refer Ancillary Relief Application to Royal Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Registrar erred in refusing to refer the ancillary relief application to the Royal Court
  2. 2 Whether the Registrar exercised her discretion properly under Rule 61 of the Matrimonial Causes (Jersey) Rules 2005
  3. 3 Whether the appellant's perception of bias or unfairness justified referral

Ratio Decidendi

The Registrar exercised her discretion properly under Rule 61, considering all relevant factors, and there was no procedural irregularity or error in law. The appellant's subjective perception of unfairness did not meet the objective test for bias or justify referral to the Royal Court. The appeal was dismissed as there was no basis for intervention by the Royal Court.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No order as to costs; each party to bear their own costs