Marquer -v- AG [2017] JRC 002 (05 January 2017)
The appeal was dismissed because the Assistant Magistrate's findings were not against the weight of evidence, the defence evidence was properly considered, and although there was a serious breach of disclosure obligations by the prosecution, the undisclosed material would not have assisted the defence as actually run at trial and did not affect the fairness of the proceedings.
- Citation
- [2017] JRC 002
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellant (unnamed); Respondent: Crown (Prosecution)
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 05 January 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure Obligations, Dangerous Driving, Failure to Stop, Failure to Provide Driver Information, Evidential Weight, Alibi Evidence, Appeal Grounds
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Appellant (unnamed)
Appellant
Crown (Prosecution)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Assistant Magistrate failed to properly treat alibi evidence
- 2 Whether the prosecution failed in its disclosure obligations and if so, whether this rendered the conviction unsafe
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the Assistant Magistrate's findings were not against the weight of evidence, the defence evidence was properly considered, and although there was a serious breach of disclosure obligations by the prosecution, the undisclosed material would not have assisted the defence as actually run at trial and did not affect the fairness of the proceedings.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Conviction upheld
- No retrial ordered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment