Rebolo v AG 27-Apr-2021 [2021] JRC 122 (27 April 2021)
The Relief Magistrate correctly applied the legal test for deportation, considering the appellant's high risk of reconviction, history of drug misuse, threats to public officials, and lack of genuine family ties in Jersey. Deportation was not disproportionate to Article 8 rights. The recommendation for deportation...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] JRC 122
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Recommendation for Deportation
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Deportation, Proportionality, Public Good, Article 8 ECHR, Disorderly Conduct
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Appellant
Appellant
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Recommendation for Deportation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant's continued presence in Jersey is detrimental to the public good
- 2 Whether deportation is disproportionate to the appellant's Article 8 ECHR rights
Ratio Decidendi
The Relief Magistrate correctly applied the legal test for deportation, considering the appellant's high risk of reconviction, history of drug misuse, threats to public officials, and lack of genuine family ties in Jersey. Deportation was not disproportionate to Article 8 rights. The recommendation for deportation was within the range of permissible decisions and should not be interfered with on appeal.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Recommendation for deportation upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment