Lewis v AG [2001] JRC 153A (23 July 2001)

Lewis v AG [2001] JRC 153A (23 July 2001)

The Magistrate's decision to impose disqualification was unreasonable because the appellant acted in a genuine emergency to save his choking baby, there was no evidence of risk to others, and no moral blame attached to his conduct.

Citation
[2001] JRC 153A
Parties
Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: Attorney General
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
23 July 2001
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Speeding, Sentencing, Mitigation, Emergency Circumstances
Criminal Law Road Traffic Law Speeding Sentencing Mitigation Emergency Circumstances

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Appellant

Appellant

Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence of disqualification for speeding was manifestly excessive given the emergency circumstances
  2. 2 Whether the Magistrate's reasoning was unreasonable in the circumstances

Ratio Decidendi

The Magistrate's decision to impose disqualification was unreasonable because the appellant acted in a genuine emergency to save his choking baby, there was no evidence of risk to others, and no moral blame attached to his conduct.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • sentence quashed
  • absolute discharge substituted