AG v Hopkins [2018] JRC 168 (11 September 2018)
There was evidence before the Relief Magistrate on which she could properly convict the appellant, including the credible testimony of PC Ross and the appellant's equivocal responses. The Relief Magistrate's assessment of credibility and weight of evidence was not flawed, and there was no improper reversal of the burden of proof or failure to consider good character.
- Citation
- [2018] JRC 168
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Use of Mobile Phone While Driving, Burden of Proof, Credibility of Witnesses, Good Character Direction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Appellant
Appellant
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was holding a telephone while driving contrary to Article 50(1) of the Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956
- 2 Whether the Relief Magistrate erred in assessing the credibility of the witnesses
- 3 Whether the burden of proof was improperly reversed
Ratio Decidendi
There was evidence before the Relief Magistrate on which she could properly convict the appellant, including the credible testimony of PC Ross and the appellant's equivocal responses. The Relief Magistrate's assessment of credibility and weight of evidence was not flawed, and there was no improper reversal of the burden of proof or failure to consider good character.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment