Page v AG [2003] JRC 054 (18 March 2003)

Page v AG [2003] JRC 054 (18 March 2003)

The sentence imposed by the Magistrate was not wrong in principle or manifestly excessive, and the guilty plea was taken into account.

Citation
[2003] JRC 054
Parties
Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: Respondent
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
18 March 2003
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Mitigation, Larceny, Guilty Plea Discount
Criminal Law Sentencing Mitigation Larceny Guilty Plea Discount

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Appellant

Appellant

Respondent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed was wrong in principle or manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Whether the guilty plea was properly considered for mitigation

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence imposed by the Magistrate was not wrong in principle or manifestly excessive, and the guilty plea was taken into account.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No change to sentence
  • 42 days loss of remission imposed by Board of Visitors not considered in this appeal