J v AG 19-Oct-2020 [2020] JRC 219 (19 October 2020)
The applicant is assessed as low risk, has responded positively to supervision and treatment, and the risk to the public does not justify continued notification requirements.
- Citation
- [2020] JRC 219
- Parties
- Applicant: Applicant; Respondent: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 19 October 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Lift Notification Requirements / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Sex Offender Notification Requirements, De Notification, Possession of Indecent Images
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
Applicant
Applicant
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to Lift Notification Requirements / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should remain subject to sex offender notification requirements
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant is assessed as low risk, has responded positively to supervision and treatment, and the risk to the public does not justify continued notification requirements.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Notification requirements lifted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment