1999/226 - AG v Le Cras [1999] UR 226 (22 December 1999)
Bail is refused due to the applicant's previous absconding, dishonesty, seriousness of the offences, and criminal record, notwithstanding the potential reduction in the indicted sum.
- Citation
- [1999] UR 226
- Parties
- Applicant: Applicant; Respondent: Crown
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 22 December 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Bail Application / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- Bail refused
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Pre Trial Detention
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Parties
Applicant
Applicant
Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bail Application / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether bail should be granted to the applicant given the circumstances of absconding, seriousness of offences, and ongoing investigations reducing the indicted sum.
Ratio Decidendi
Bail is refused due to the applicant's previous absconding, dishonesty, seriousness of the offences, and criminal record, notwithstanding the potential reduction in the indicted sum.
Court Disposition
Bail refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment