1999/60 - AG v Sheridan [1999] UR 60 (26 March 1999)
The Magistrate's decision was not unreasonable and was correct in light of the applicant's repeated breaches and alleged further offences.
- Citation
- [1999] UR 60
- Parties
- Applicant: Applicant; Respondent: Magistrate
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 26 March 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Review of Magistrate's Decision, Breach of Binding Over Order, Breach of Probation Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Applicant
Applicant
Magistrate
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Magistrate erred in law or reached an unreasonable decision in refusing the application
Ratio Decidendi
The Magistrate's decision was not unreasonable and was correct in light of the applicant's repeated breaches and alleged further offences.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment