Sumera v Atlantique Seafood trading as Soy Sushi Restaurant 22-Aug-2019 [2019] JRC 164 (22 August 2019)

Sumera v Atlantique Seafood trading as Soy Sushi Restaurant 22-Aug-2019 [2019] JRC 164 (22 August 2019)

No error of law was found in the Tribunal's decision; the contract expressly excluded paid overtime, and the applicant's right to claim time off in lieu lapsed upon termination at his own instance. Findings of fact regarding working conditions and TOIL were conclusive and did not raise points of law for appeal.

Citation
[2019] JRC 164
Parties
Applicant: Applicant; Respondent: Respondent
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
22 August 2019
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Decision on Papers
Outcome
leave to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Time Off in Lieu, Unpaid Wages, Implied Terms, Termination of Employment
Employment Law Time Off in Lieu Unpaid Wages Implied Terms Termination of Employment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Applicant

Applicant

Respondent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Decision on Papers

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to payment for untaken time off in lieu upon termination
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to unpaid wages due to alleged intolerable working conditions
  3. 3 Whether the Tribunal erred in law in its findings and application of legal principles

Ratio Decidendi

No error of law was found in the Tribunal's decision; the contract expressly excluded paid overtime, and the applicant's right to claim time off in lieu lapsed upon termination at his own instance. Findings of fact regarding working conditions and TOIL were conclusive and did not raise points of law for appeal.

Court Disposition

leave to appeal refused