Kidd and Ors v All Services Group Holdings Limited and Ors 05-Nov-2019 [2019] JRC 221 (05 November 2019)
There is a realistic prospect of a claim against CarVal generating a surplus, giving shareholders a legitimate interest in the winding up and standing to seek appointment of additional liquidators. Joint Liquidators, funded by CarVal and committed to the Aeon Report, are not appropriate to pursue the claim. Additional liquidators should be appointed to investigate and, if appropriate, pursue the claim against CarVal, with delineation of responsibilities and directions as to funding, costs, and conduct.
- Citation
- [2019] JRC 221
- Parties
- Representor/shareholder: Robert Gordon Kidd; Representor/shareholder: Milan Balac; Representor/shareholder: Lee Brian Cox; Substantial Creditor: CVI CVF III Lux Finance Sarl; Substantial Creditor: EOC Lux Finance Sarl; Substantial Creditor: CarVal Investors GB LLP; Joint Liquidator: Malcolm Cohen; Joint Liquidator: Philip Braun; Additional Liquidator: Adrian Rabet; Additional Liquidator: Darren Reeds
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 05 November 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Creditors' Winding Up Representation / Appointment of Additional Liquidators and Directions
- Outcome
- Appointment of additional liquidators; directions issued; stay of dividend proceedings; review in 6 months.
- Legal Topics
- Appointment/removal of Liquidators, Valuation of Collateral, Conflict of Interest, Locus Standi, Distribution of Assets
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Gordon Kidd
Representor/shareholder
Milan Balac
Representor/shareholder
Lee Brian Cox
Representor/shareholder
CVI CVF III Lux Finance Sarl
Substantial Creditor
EOC Lux Finance Sarl
Substantial Creditor
CarVal Investors GB LLP
Substantial Creditor
Malcolm Cohen
Joint Liquidator
Philip Braun
Joint Liquidator
Adrian Rabet
Additional Liquidator
Darren Reeds
Additional Liquidator
Procedural Posture
Creditors' Winding Up Representation / Appointment of Additional Liquidators and Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Is there a realistic prospect of a claim by ASGH against CarVal generating a surplus over the sums due to CarVal?
- 2 Who should investigate and, if appropriate, bring that claim?
- 3 Do the shareholders have locus standi to seek removal or appointment of liquidators in a creditors' winding up?
Ratio Decidendi
There is a realistic prospect of a claim against CarVal generating a surplus, giving shareholders a legitimate interest in the winding up and standing to seek appointment of additional liquidators. Joint Liquidators, funded by CarVal and committed to the Aeon Report, are not appropriate to pursue the claim. Additional liquidators should be appointed to investigate and, if appropriate, pursue the claim against CarVal, with delineation of responsibilities and directions as to funding, costs, and conduct.
Court Disposition
Appointment of additional liquidators; directions issued; stay of dividend proceedings; review in 6 months.
Orders
- Joint Liquidators to remain in office with exclusive conduct of liquidation except for CarVal claim.
- Additional Liquidators (Adrian Rabet and Darren Reeds) appointed with exclusive conduct of CarVal claim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment