Apricus Investments v CIS [2004] JLR_Note 5 (16 February 2004)
The court imposed a sentence for criminal contempt to maintain its authority and deter future breaches.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Apricus Investments; Respondent: CIS
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 16 February 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Contempt / Sentence
- Outcome
- sentence imposed for criminal contempt
- Legal Topics
- Criminal Contempt, Sentencing
Criminal Law Contempt of Court Criminal Contempt Sentencing
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Parties
Apricus Investments
Applicant
CIS
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Contempt / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate sentence for criminal contempt of court?
Ratio Decidendi
The court imposed a sentence for criminal contempt to maintain its authority and deter future breaches.
Court Disposition
sentence imposed for criminal contempt
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment