Apricus Investments v CIS [2004] JLR_Note 5 (16 February 2004)

Apricus Investments v CIS [2004] JLR_Note 5 (16 February 2004)

The court imposed a sentence for criminal contempt to maintain its authority and deter future breaches.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Applicant: Apricus Investments; Respondent: CIS
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
16 February 2004
Procedural Posture
Criminal Contempt / Sentence
Outcome
sentence imposed for criminal contempt
Legal Topics
Criminal Contempt, Sentencing
Criminal Law Contempt of Court Criminal Contempt Sentencing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Apricus Investments

Applicant

CIS

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Contempt / Sentence

  1. 1 What is the appropriate sentence for criminal contempt of court?

Ratio Decidendi

The court imposed a sentence for criminal contempt to maintain its authority and deter future breaches.

Court Disposition

sentence imposed for criminal contempt