Armco Inc. v Donohue [1999] JLR_Note 11c (31 March 1999)
The court held that the implied undertaking regarding use of information obtained under a Mareva injunction may be varied by the court in appropriate circumstances.
- Parties
- Applicant: Armco Inc.; Respondent: Donohue
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 31 March 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- application for variation considered
- Legal Topics
- Mareva Injunction, Implied Undertaking, Variation of Undertaking
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Armco Inc.
Applicant
Donohue
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether information obtained under a Mareva injunction can be used for purposes other than the proceedings
- 2 Whether the implied undertaking regarding use of information can be varied
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the implied undertaking regarding use of information obtained under a Mareva injunction may be varied by the court in appropriate circumstances.
Court Disposition
application for variation considered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment