Jersey Judgment

Att. Gen. v Arthur [1990] JLR 11 (16 January 1990)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court held that the offence under Housing (Jersey) Law, 1949, art. 14(1)(d) is not one of strict liability; intent or knowledge is required for liability.

Court disposition

offence not of strict liability; intent required

02

Material facts

Parties

Attorney General

Applicant

Arthur

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The Attorney General argued that the offence under article 14(1)(d) of the Housing (Jersey) Law, 1949 is one of strict liability and that the respondent committed an offence by employing a device, plan or scheme inconsistent with the application.
Respondent
The respondent argued that the offence is not one of strict liability and that intent or knowledge is required for liability under article 14(1)(d).

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    general criminal law principle

    Strict liability offences require no proof of intent unless expressly or impliedly required by the statute.

  2. 02

    statutory interpretation doctrine

    Statutory interpretation must consider the wording and purpose of the provision.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court held that the offence under Housing (Jersey) Law, 1949, art. 14(1)(d) is not one of strict liability; intent or knowledge is required for liability.

Court disposition

offence not of strict liability; intent required

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[1990] JLR 11

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Att. Gen. v Arthur [1990] JLR 11 (16 January 1990) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1990/JLR900011.html Cite as: [1990] JLR 11 [ New search ] [ Help ] Att. Gen. v Arthur 1990 JLR 11 (16 January 1990) Housing - offences - "device, plan or scheme" inconsistent with application - offence under Housing (Jersey) Law, 1949, art. 14(1)(d) not one of strict liability The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 1990 JLR 11 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1990/JLR900011.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Housing (Jersey) Law, 1949, art. 14(1)(d)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.