Att. Gen. v Bevis [2001] JLR_Note 43 (31 August 2001)
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court considered the principles governing the imposition of concurrent and consecutive sentences.
02
Material facts
Parties
Attorney General
ApplicantBevis
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal / Sentence
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether sentences should run concurrently or consecutively
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
common law
Sentences may be ordered to run concurrently or consecutively depending on the circumstances of the offences.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court considered the principles governing the imposition of concurrent and consecutive sentences.
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [
DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:
BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Att. Gen. v Bevis [2001] JLR_Note 43 (31 August 2001) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2001/JLR01N043.html Cite as: [2001] JLR_Note 43 [ New search ] [ Help ] Att. Gen. v Bevis 2001 JLR Note 43 (31 August 2001) Criminal Procedure-sentence-concurrent and consecutive sentences The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2001 JLR Note 43 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2001/JLR01N043.html
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.