Att. Gen. v Da Silva [2008] JLR_Note 12 (03 March 2008)
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Criminal / Confiscation Order
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court considered whether a confiscation order was appropriate in relation to proceeds of drug trafficking.
02
Material facts
Parties
Attorney General
ApplicantDa Silva
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal / Confiscation Order
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
whether a confiscation order should be made in relation to proceeds of drug trafficking
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
statute/common law
confiscation orders may be made in respect of proceeds of drug trafficking
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court considered whether a confiscation order was appropriate in relation to proceeds of drug trafficking.
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [
DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:
BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Att. Gen. v Da Silva [2008] JLR_Note 12 (03 March 2008) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2008/JLR08N012.html Cite as: [2008] JLR_Note 12 [ New search ] [ Help ] Att. Gen. v Da Silva 2008 JLR Note 12 (03 March 2008) Criminal Law-drugs-proceeds of trafficking-confiscation order The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2008 JLR Note 12 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2008/JLR08N012.html
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.