Att. Gen. v Marrett [2000] JLR_Note 60b (18 August 2000)
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Criminal / Judgment
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court determined the appropriate sentencing tariff for the offence of false imprisonment.
Court disposition
judgment delivered
02
Material facts
Parties
Attorney General
ApplicantMarrett
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal / Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
What is the appropriate tariff for false imprisonment?
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
common law
Tariff for false imprisonment must reflect the seriousness of the offence.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court determined the appropriate sentencing tariff for the offence of false imprisonment.
Court disposition
judgment delivered
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [
DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:
BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Att. Gen. v Marrett [2000] JLR_Note 60b (18 August 2000) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2000/JLR00N060b.html Cite as: [2000] JLR_Note 60b [ New search ] [ Help ] Att. Gen. v Marrett 2000 JLR Note 60b (18 August 2000) FALSE IMPRISONMENT-tariff The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2000 JLR Note 60b BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2000/JLR00N060b.html
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.