Jersey Judgment

Att. Gen. v Shewan [2005] JLR 265 (19 April 2005)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

For the offence of affray on private premises, the presence of a bystander is required, but this is not necessary if the affray occurs in public. A bystander is considered present if the affray occurs within their sight or hearing.

Court disposition

clarification of law

02

Material facts

Parties

Attorney General

Applicant

Shewan

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The prosecution argued that for the offence of affray on private premises, a bystander must be present, but this requirement does not apply if the affray occurs in public.
Respondent
The defence contended that the presence of a bystander is necessary for the offence of affray regardless of whether it occurs in public or private, and questioned the definition of 'bystander'.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    [2005] JLR 265

    A bystander (i.e. a person not complicit in the affray) must be present for affray on private premises but not if the affray is in public.

  2. 02

    [2005] JLR 265

    A bystander is present if the affray occurs within their sight or hearing.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

For the offence of affray on private premises, the presence of a bystander is required, but this is not necessary if the affray occurs in public. A bystander is considered present if the affray occurs within their sight or hearing.

Court disposition

clarification of law

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2005] JLR 265

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Att. Gen. v Shewan [2005] JLR 265 (19 April 2005) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2005/JLR050265.html Cite as: [2005] JLR 265 [ New search ] [ Help ] Att. Gen. v Shewan 2005 JLR 265 (19 April 2005) Criminal Law-affray-elements of offence-bystander (i.e. person not complicit in affray) must be present for affray on private premises but not if affray in public-bystander present if affray occurs within sight or hearing The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2005 JLR 265 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2005/JLR050265.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.