Att. Gen. v U [2011] JLR_Note 27 (24 June 2011)
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Criminal / Interlocutory
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court considered the admissibility of similar fact evidence.
02
Material facts
Parties
Attorney General
ApplicantU
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal / Interlocutory
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether similar fact evidence is admissible
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
common law
Similar fact evidence may be admissible if it is relevant and its probative value outweighs its prejudicial effect.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court considered the admissibility of similar fact evidence.
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [
DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:
BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Att. Gen. v U [2011] JLR_Note 27 (24 June 2011) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2011/JLR11N027.html Cite as: [2011] JLR_Note 27 [ New search ] [ Help ] Att. Gen. v U 2011 JLR Note 27 (24 June 2011) Evidence-similar facts-admissibility The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2011 JLR Note 27 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2011/JLR11N027.html
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.