Att. Gen. v Young [1998] JLR_Note 16c (09 July 1998)
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Criminal / Judgment
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court determined whether the accused's actions amounted to fraudulent inducement, whether multiple offences were committed, and whether the prosecution was barred by prescription.
02
Material facts
Parties
Attorney General
ApplicantYoung
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal / Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the accused committed fraudulent inducement of investors
- 02
Whether multiple offences were committed
- 03
Whether the offences are prescribed
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The accused fraudulently induced investors, committed multiple offences, and the offences are not prescribed.
- Respondent
- The respondent contests the allegations of fraudulent inducement, challenges the multiplicity of offences, and asserts prescription applies.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Jersey criminal law
Fraudulent inducement of investors constitutes a criminal offence under investor protection laws.
- 02
Jersey law on prescription
Prescription may bar prosecution if the statutory period has elapsed.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court determined whether the accused's actions amounted to fraudulent inducement, whether multiple offences were committed, and whether the prosecution was barred by prescription.
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [
DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:
BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Att. Gen. v Young [1998] JLR_Note 16c (09 July 1998) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1998/JLR98N016c.html Cite as: [1998] JLR_Note 16c [ New search ] [ Help ] Att. Gen. v Young 1998 JLR Note 16c (09 July 1998) INVESTOR PROTECTION-fraudulent inducement to investors-multiple offences-prescription The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 1998 JLR Note 16c BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1998/JLR98N016c.html
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.