Attard v Att. Gen. [1991] JLR_Note 7a (21 October 1991)
The court clarified the legal standard for determining when a person is an accessory after the fact.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attard; Respondent: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 21 October 1991
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment delivered
- Legal Topics
- Complicity, Accessory After the Fact
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Parties
Attard
Applicant
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 What constitutes being an accessory after the fact under Jersey law?
Ratio Decidendi
The court clarified the legal standard for determining when a person is an accessory after the fact.
Court Disposition
judgment delivered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment