AG v Akers and Green [2002] JRC 240 (16 December 2002)

AG v Akers and Green [2002] JRC 240 (16 December 2002)

The Court determined that Green acted as a courier, not an organiser, and accepted his claim of non-financial motivation. Despite mitigation and naivety, the seriousness of the offence and the well-organised nature of the scheme warranted substantial custodial sentences, with all mitigating factors considered.

Citation
[2002] JRC 240
Parties
Accused: Green; Accused: Akers; Respondent: Attorney General
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
16 December 2002
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
conviction and sentencing
Legal Topics
Drug Offences, Sentencing Guidelines, Mitigation
Criminal Law Drug Offences Sentencing Guidelines Mitigation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Green

Accused

Akers

Accused

Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 appropriate sentencing for drug courier
  2. 2 application of sentencing guidelines
  3. 3 consideration of mitigation

Ratio Decidendi

The Court determined that Green acted as a courier, not an organiser, and accepted his claim of non-financial motivation. Despite mitigation and naivety, the seriousness of the offence and the well-organised nature of the scheme warranted substantial custodial sentences, with all mitigating factors considered.

Court Disposition

conviction and sentencing

Orders

  • Green sentenced to six years' imprisonment
  • Akers sentenced to seven years' imprisonment