De Figueiredo v Att. Gen. [2010] JLR 497 (08 October 2010)
A petition of doleance is not a suitable remedy for challenging interlocutory decisions of a trial judge in extradition proceedings, as such decisions may be appealed to the Privy Council if extradition is ordered, and case management decisions are best left to the trial judge.
- Citation
- [2010] JLR 497
- Parties
- Petitioner: De Figueiredo; Respondent: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 08 October 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Extradition / Interlocutory Appeal
- Outcome
- petition of doleance dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Petition of Doleance, Case Management, Appeal Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
De Figueiredo
Petitioner
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Extradition / Interlocutory Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a petition of doleance is an appropriate remedy against an interlocutory decision of a trial judge in extradition proceedings
- 2 Whether the Superior Number should interfere with case management decisions of a trial judge
Ratio Decidendi
A petition of doleance is not a suitable remedy for challenging interlocutory decisions of a trial judge in extradition proceedings, as such decisions may be appealed to the Privy Council if extradition is ordered, and case management decisions are best left to the trial judge.
Court Disposition
petition of doleance dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment