Att. Gen. v. Barette [2016] 2 JLR_Note 13 (03 October 2016)
Alteration of a protected building without consent constitutes a breach of planning law.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Barette
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 03 October 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Planning Law / Judgment
- Outcome
- Not available
- Legal Topics
- Buildings of Special Architectural or Historical Interest, Alteration Without Consent
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Barette
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Planning Law / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether alteration of a building of special architectural or historical interest was carried out without consent
Ratio Decidendi
Alteration of a protected building without consent constitutes a breach of planning law.
Court Disposition
Not available
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment