Att. Gen. v Bell [2001] JLR_Note 7 (12 January 2001)
The court determined the appropriate sentence for possession of explosives with reference to the statutory maximum and the facts of the case.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Bell
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 12 January 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- sentence imposed
- Legal Topics
- Explosives, Possession, Sentencing, Maximum Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Bell
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate sentence for possession of explosives?
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined the appropriate sentence for possession of explosives with reference to the statutory maximum and the facts of the case.
Court Disposition
sentence imposed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment