Att. Gen. v Bevis [2001] JLR_Note 43 (31 August 2001)
The court considered the principles governing the imposition of concurrent and consecutive sentences.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Bevis
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 31 August 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Concurrent Sentences, Consecutive Sentences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Bevis
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sentences should run concurrently or consecutively
Ratio Decidendi
The court considered the principles governing the imposition of concurrent and consecutive sentences.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment