Att. Gen. v Bray [2000] JLR_Note 58a (27 January 2000)
The court held that the supplier may be named in open court unless specific evidence demonstrates a risk to justice or safety.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Bray
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 27 January 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment
- Outcome
- application granted
- Legal Topics
- Drug Importation, Open Court Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Bray
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the supplier of drugs should be named in open court during importation proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the supplier may be named in open court unless specific evidence demonstrates a risk to justice or safety.
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- Supplier may be named in open court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment