Att. Gen. v Brown [2000] JLR_Note 57a (25 February 2000)
The court considered the appropriateness of concurrent versus consecutive sentences in cases involving resisting arrest for another offence.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Brown
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Concurrent Sentences, Consecutive Sentences, Resisting Arrest
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Brown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sentences for resisting arrest for another offence should be concurrent or consecutive
Ratio Decidendi
The court considered the appropriateness of concurrent versus consecutive sentences in cases involving resisting arrest for another offence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment