AG v C [2011] JRC 246 (28 December 2011)

By consent, notification requirements and restrictive orders regarding contact with specified individuals are imposed; prohibition on being alone with females under 18 is not justified due to lack of evidence and proportionality.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2011] JRC 246
Parties: Respondent: C; Applicant: Attorney General
Jurisdiction: Jersey
Judgment Date: 28 December 2011
Procedural Posture: Application Under Sex Offenders (jersey) Law / Final Judgment
Outcome: application granted in part
Legal Topics: Sex Offender Notification, Restrictive Orders, Risk Assessment

Criminal Law Family Law Sex Offender Notification Restrictive Orders Risk Assessment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Respondent

Attorney General

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Application Under Sex Offenders (jersey) Law / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Should C be subject to notification requirements under the Sex Offenders (Jersey) Law?
2 Should restrictive orders be imposed under Article 10 of the Law?
3 Is a prohibition on being alone with females under 18 justified?

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

application granted in part

Orders

C subject to notification requirements under the Law for minimum five years before application to dis-apply.
C prohibited from contacting A, B, D, or E except inadvertent or unavoidable contact.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.