AG v Camacho and Melim [1997] JRC 200 (24 October 1997)

AG v Camacho and Melim [1997] JRC 200 (24 October 1997)

The court determined the appropriate sentence for the respondents based on the gravity of the drug offence and the need for deterrence.

Citation
[1997] JRC 200
Parties
Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Camacho; Respondent: Melim
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
24 October 1997
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Outcome
sentence imposed
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Drug Offences

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Attorney General

Applicant

Camacho

Respondent

Melim

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Judgment

  1. 1 appropriate sentencing for drug offences

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined the appropriate sentence for the respondents based on the gravity of the drug offence and the need for deterrence.

Court Disposition

sentence imposed

Orders

  • respondents sentenced for drug offences