Att. Gen. v Casey [2001] JLR_Note 11 (06 February 2001)
The court considered the relevance of mitigation in determining sentence.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Casey
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 06 February 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Legal Topics
- Sentence, Mitigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Casey
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 What factors are relevant to mitigation in sentencing?
Ratio Decidendi
The court considered the relevance of mitigation in determining sentence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment