Att. Gen. v Channing [2004] JLR 265 (15 July 2004)
Offences are properly joined under r.3 if they are of a similar type, committed by similar methods, and close in time.
- Citation
- [2004] JLR 265
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Channing
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 15 July 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Pre Trial
- Outcome
- joinder upheld
- Legal Topics
- Joinder of Charges, Indictment Rules, Falsifying Documents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Channing
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Pre Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether charges were properly joined under Indictments (Jersey) Rules 1972, r.3
Ratio Decidendi
Offences are properly joined under r.3 if they are of a similar type, committed by similar methods, and close in time.
Court Disposition
joinder upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment