AG v Warren and Others [2009] JRC 060F (03 April 2009)
Leave to appeal is granted where the issue is clearly arguable and not merely technical; technical points may be refused at this stage and require leave from a higher court.
- Citation
- [2009] JRC 060F
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Curtis Warren; Respondent: John Alan Welsh; Respondent: James O'Brien; Respondent: Jason Woodward; Respondent: Paul Hunt; Respondent: Oliver Lucas; Amicus: Advocate R. Tremoceiro
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 03 April 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Ruling on Applications for Leave to Appeal Interlocutory Decisions
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted in part, refused in part.
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Admissibility of Evidence, Antecedent Records, Prison Visits, Letters of Request
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Curtis Warren
Respondent
John Alan Welsh
Respondent
James O'Brien
Respondent
Jason Woodward
Respondent
Paul Hunt
Respondent
Oliver Lucas
Respondent
Advocate R. Tremoceiro
Amicus
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Ruling on Applications for Leave to Appeal Interlocutory Decisions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted regarding rulings on antecedent records, prison visits, and redacted letters of request
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal is granted where the issue is clearly arguable and not merely technical; technical points may be refused at this stage and require leave from a higher court.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted in part, refused in part.
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted regarding antecedent records of Liazid, Vatandas, and O'Brien.
- Leave to appeal granted regarding prison visits.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment