AG -v- Da Silva [2008] JRC 033 (03 March 2008)
The Court retains jurisdiction to make a confiscation order despite the expiry of the six-month period without consideration of exceptional circumstances, as the legislative intent and public interest in confiscation outweigh procedural defects, and the delay was minimal and justified.
- Citation
- [2008] JRC 033
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Defendant
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 03 March 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Post Conviction Confiscation Order Application
- Outcome
- Application adjourned; Court retains jurisdiction to consider confiscation order.
- Legal Topics
- Confiscation Order, Statutory Time Limits, Jurisdiction, Drug Trafficking
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Defendant
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Post Conviction Confiscation Order Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court retains jurisdiction to make a confiscation order after expiry of the six-month statutory period without consideration of exceptional circumstances
- 2 Whether the Court should exercise its discretion to proceed with confiscation despite procedural delay
Ratio Decidendi
The Court retains jurisdiction to make a confiscation order despite the expiry of the six-month period without consideration of exceptional circumstances, as the legislative intent and public interest in confiscation outweigh procedural defects, and the delay was minimal and justified.
Court Disposition
Application adjourned; Court retains jurisdiction to consider confiscation order.
Orders
- Case adjourned to 5th March for consideration of confiscation order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment