Att. Gen. v Dingle [2009] JLR_Note 7 (17 February 2009)
The court held that the admissibility of statements depends on the seriousness of the breach and its impact on fairness.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Dingle
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment delivered
- Legal Topics
- Police Conduct, Admissibility of Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Dingle
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether statements to police breached the Code of Conduct and their admissibility as evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the admissibility of statements depends on the seriousness of the breach and its impact on fairness.
Court Disposition
judgment delivered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment