Att. Gen. v E [2012] 1 JLR_Note 1 (07 November 2011)

Att. Gen. v E [2012] 1 JLR_Note 1 (07 November 2011)

The court determined that the correct test on appeal is whether the lower court properly exercised its discretion in setting the notification period under the relevant statutory framework.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: E
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
07 November 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Sex Offenders, Notification Requirements, Appeal Period
Criminal Law Sex Offenders Notification Requirements Appeal Period

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Attorney General

Applicant

E

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What is the appropriate test on appeal regarding the application period for notification requirements under the Sex Offenders (Jersey) Law 2010?

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that the correct test on appeal is whether the lower court properly exercised its discretion in setting the notification period under the relevant statutory framework.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed