AG v Ellis 24-Nov-2020 [2020] JRC 245 (24 November 2020)
The entire bank account is tainted property as it was used as an instrumentality for tax evasion, and in the absence of evidence from the respondent, forfeiture of the whole account is proportionate and does not breach Article 1 Protocol 1 ECHR.
- Citation
- [2020] JRC 245
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Ellis
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Forfeiture Application / Remitted to Royal Court After Court of Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Forfeiture order granted for the entire account.
- Legal Topics
- Forfeiture of Tainted Property, Proceeds of Crime, Instrumentalities of Crime, Proportionality, Tax Evasion, Burden of Proof, Article 1 Protocol 1 ECHR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Ellis
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Forfeiture Application / Remitted to Royal Court After Court of Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the entire bank account constitutes tainted property under the Forfeiture of Assets (Civil Proceedings)(Jersey) Law 2018
- 2 Whether forfeiture of the entire account is proportionate under Article 1 Protocol 1 ECHR
Ratio Decidendi
The entire bank account is tainted property as it was used as an instrumentality for tax evasion, and in the absence of evidence from the respondent, forfeiture of the whole account is proportionate and does not breach Article 1 Protocol 1 ECHR.
Court Disposition
Forfeiture order granted for the entire account.
Orders
- Forfeiture of the entire content of the respondent's bank account at Standard Chartered Bank, Jersey.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment