Att. Gen. v Fann [1996] JLR_Note 13a (31 May 1996)
The court determined the appropriate maximum penalty for the offence of making incorrect statements.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Fann
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 31 May 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment delivered
- Legal Topics
- Incorrect Statements, Maximum Penalty
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Fann
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate maximum penalty for making incorrect statements?
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined the appropriate maximum penalty for the offence of making incorrect statements.
Court Disposition
judgment delivered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment