Att. Gen. v Hill [2000] JLR_Note 62c (25 January 2000)
The court held that restitution by a third party to the victim of fraud is an appropriate sentencing measure.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Hill
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 25 January 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- restitution ordered
- Legal Topics
- Restitution, Fraud, Third Party Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Hill
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether restitution by a third party to the victim of fraud is appropriate in sentencing
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that restitution by a third party to the victim of fraud is an appropriate sentencing measure.
Court Disposition
restitution ordered
Orders
- Restitution by third party to victim of fraud
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment