Att. Gen. v James [2013] 1 JLR_Note 18 (03 May 2013)
The court determined the appropriate sanction for professional misconduct by an advocate.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: James
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 03 May 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Disciplinary Proceedings / Sanction for Professional Misconduct
- Outcome
- sanction imposed
- Legal Topics
- Advocates, Professional Misconduct, Sanctions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
James
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Disciplinary Proceedings / Sanction for Professional Misconduct
Legal Issues
- 1 appropriate sanction for professional misconduct by advocate
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined the appropriate sanction for professional misconduct by an advocate.
Court Disposition
sanction imposed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment