Att. Gen. v Keenan (nee Hugh) [2011] JLR_Note 31 (22 July 2011)
Development was carried out without the required planning permission, constituting a breach of planning law.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Keenan (nee Hugh)
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 22 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Planning Enforcement / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for applicant
- Legal Topics
- Planning Permission, Development Without Permission
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Keenan (nee Hugh)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Planning Enforcement / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether development was carried out without planning permission
Ratio Decidendi
Development was carried out without the required planning permission, constituting a breach of planning law.
Court Disposition
Judgment for applicant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment