Att. Gen. v Marett [2008] JLR_Note 2 (11 January 2008)
The court determined the appropriate sentence for an act of vigilante violence, emphasizing the need for deterrence and upholding the rule of law.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Marett
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 11 January 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Vigilante Violence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Marett
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for vigilante violence
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined the appropriate sentence for an act of vigilante violence, emphasizing the need for deterrence and upholding the rule of law.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment