Att. Gen. v. Maton [2016] 1 JLR_Note 13 (24 March 2016)
The court considered whether the respondent should be committed for trial.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Maton
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 24 March 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Committal Proceedings
- Legal Topics
- Committal for Trial
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Maton
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Committal Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent should be committed for trial
Ratio Decidendi
The court considered whether the respondent should be committed for trial.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment